LEADER 01824nls a2200301 n 450 
001 EJ21002770
005 20180212170424.0
017 80$aoai:ojs.riviste.unimi.it:article/9566
049   $aARMAGDIG
100   $a20190501a2017    --k--ita-50----ba 
101 1 $aita
200 1 $aPer una rideterminazione della naturalità dell'arte$bArticolo
210  1$cUniversità degli Studi di Milano$d2017-11-01
300   $aDiritti: Copyright (c) 2018 Materiali di Estetica. Terza serie
300   $aIn relazione con: https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/MdE/article/view/9566/9052
300   $aSorgente: Materiali di Estetica. Terza serie; N. 4.1 (2017): La filosofia e le arti
300   $aSorgente: 2283-558X
300   $aSorgente: 2283-558X
330   $aIn our metaphysical tradition, art has always been intended as the opposite pole of nature. Art, in the strict philosophical meaning of the concept, has always indicated the artificial character of a thing. In this sense, art has been intended as the name of the process through which an artificial object is produced. For this reason, the Greek term for art is téchne, which also means technology. But art also means the artistic, aesthetic character of things, particularly of natural things. That is why it is imperative to reconsider the philosophical meaning of art, nature, technology and their problematic conceptual relationship.     
332   $aMateriali di Estetica. Terza serie; N. 4.1 (2017): La filosofia e le arti
336   $aapplication/pdf
700  0$aPorceddu Cilione, Pier Alberto
801  3$aIT$bIT-FI0098
856 4 $uhttp://memoria.depositolegale.it/*/https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/MdE/article/view/9566$2https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/MdE/article/view/9566
977   $a CR
997   $aCF
FMT   $aAR
FOR   $aAR